Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> says:
When the SPL build-phase was first created it was designed to solve a
particular problem (the need to init SDRAM so that U-Boot proper could
be loaded). It has since expanded to become an important part of U-Boot,
with three phases now present: TPL, VPL and SPL
Due to this history, the term 'SPL' is used to mean both a particular
phase (the one before U-Boot proper) and all the non-proper phases.
This has become confusing.
For a similar reason CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is set to 'y' for all 'SPL'
phases, not just SPL. So code which can only be compiled for actual SPL,
for example, must use something like this:
#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) && !defined(CONFIG_TPL_BUILD)
In Makefiles we have similar issues. SPL_ has been used as a variable
which expands to either SPL_ or nothing, to chose between options like
CONFIG_BLK and CONFIG_SPL_BLK. When TPL appeared, a new SPL_TPL variable
was created which expanded to 'SPL_', 'TPL_' or nothing. Later it was
updated to support 'VPL_' as well.
This series starts a change in terminology and usage to resolve the
above issues:
- The word 'xPL' is used instead of 'SPL' to mean a non-proper build
- A new CONFIG_XPL_BUILD define indicates that the current build is an
'xPL' build
- The existing CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is changed to mean SPL; it is not now
defined for TPL and VPL phases
- The existing SPL_ Makefile variable is renamed to SPL_
- The existing SPL_TPL Makefile variable is renamed to PHASE_
It should be noted that xpl_phase() can generally be used instead of
the above CONFIGs without a code-space or run-time penalty.
This series does not attempt to convert all of U-Boot to use this new
terminology but it makes a start. In particular, renaming spl.h and
common/spl seems like a bridge too far at this point.
The series is fully bisectable. It has also been checked to ensure there
are no code-size changes on any commit.
Update the TAMP_SMCR BKP..PROT fields to put first 10 registers
into protection zone 1 and next 5 into zone 2. This fixes use of
boot counter which is often in zone 3 and has to be updated from
Linux, which runs in NS.
Fixes: 73f7fc944c ("ARM: stm32: Initialize TAMP_SMCR BKP..PROT fields on STM32MP15xx")
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
As part of bringing the master branch back in to next, we need to allow
for all of these changes to exist here.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Remove <common.h> from all mach-stm32 and mach-stm32mp files and when
needed add missing include files directly.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
In case of an OTP-CLOSED STM32MP15xx system, the CPU core 1 cannot be
released from endless loop in BootROM only by populating TAMP BKPxR 4
and 5 with magic and branch address and sending SGI0 interrupt from
core 0 to core 1 twice. TAMP_SMCR BKP..PROT fields must be initialized
as well to release the core 1 from endless loop during the second SGI0
handling on core 1. Initialize TAMP_SMCR to protect the first 32 backup
registers, the ones which contain the core 1 magic, branch address and
boot information.
This requirement seems to be undocumented, therefore it was necessary
to trace and analyze the STM32MP15xx BootROM using OpenOCD and objdump.
Ultimately, it turns out that a certain BootROM function reads out the
TAMP_SMCR register and tests whether the BKP..PROT fields are non-zero.
If they are zero, the BootROM code again waits for SGI0 using WFI, else
the execution moves forward until it reaches handoff to the TAMP BKPxR 5
branch address.
This fixes CPU core 1 release using U-Boot PSCI implementation on an
OTP-CLOSED system, i.e. system with fuse 0 bit 6 set.
Reviewed-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
SoC revision is only accessible via DBUMCU IDC register,
which requires BSEC.DENABLE DBGSWENABLE bit to be set to
make the register accessible, otherwise an access to the
register triggers bus fault. As BSEC.DBGSWENABLE is zero
in case of an OTP-CLOSED system, do NOT set DBGSWENABLE
bit as this might open a brief window for timing attacks.
Instead, report that this system is OTP-CLOSED and do not
report any SoC revision to avoid confusing users. Use an
SEC/C abbreviation to avoid growing SOC_NAME_SIZE .
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Add initial support for STM32MP2 SoCs family.
SoCs information are available here :
https://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/campaigns/microprocessor-stm32mp2.html
Migrate all MP1 related code into stm32mp1/ directory
Create stm32mp2 directory dedicated for STM32MP2 SoCs.
Common code to MP1, MP13 and MP25 is kept into
arch/arm/mach-stm32/mach-stm32mp directory :
- boot_params.c
- bsec
- cmd_stm32key
- cmd_stm32prog
- dram_init.c
- syscon.c
- ecdsa_romapi.c
For STM32MP2, it also :
- adds memory region description needed for ARMv8 MMU.
- enables early data cache before relocation.
During the transition before/after relocation, the MMU, initially setup
at the beginning of DDR, must be setup again at a correct address after
relocation. This is done in enables_caches() by disabling cache, force
arch.tlb_fillptr to NULL which will force the MMU to be setup again but
with a new value for gd->arch.tlb_addr. gd->arch.tlb_addr has been
updated after relocation in arm_reserve_mmu().
Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
