mirror of
https://github.com/flatcar/scripts.git
synced 2025-08-10 06:26:57 +02:00
Merge pull request #787 from flatcar/dongsu/openssl-3.0.8-r4
dev-libs/openssl: update to 3.0.8-r4
This commit is contained in:
commit
ab814ddf9e
1
changelog/security/2023-05-04-openssl-3.0.8-r4.md
Normal file
1
changelog/security/2023-05-04-openssl-3.0.8-r4.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
- OpenSSL ([CVE-2023-0464](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0464), [CVE-2023-0465](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0465), [CVE-2023-0466](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0466), [CVE-2023-1255](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1255))
|
@ -0,0 +1,214 @@
|
||||
commit 959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1
|
||||
Author: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org>
|
||||
Date: Wed Mar 8 15:28:20 2023 +1100
|
||||
|
||||
x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints
|
||||
|
||||
A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions
|
||||
of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains
|
||||
that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this
|
||||
vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers
|
||||
exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service
|
||||
(DoS) attack on affected systems.
|
||||
|
||||
Fixes CVE-2023-0464
|
||||
|
||||
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
|
||||
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
|
||||
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20568)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
|
||||
index 18b53cc09e..cba107ca03 100644
|
||||
--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
|
||||
+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
|
||||
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st {
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st {
|
||||
+ /* The number of nodes in the tree */
|
||||
+ size_t node_count;
|
||||
+ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */
|
||||
+ size_t node_maximum;
|
||||
+
|
||||
/* This is the tree 'level' data */
|
||||
X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels;
|
||||
int nlevel;
|
||||
@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk,
|
||||
X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
|
||||
X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
|
||||
X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
|
||||
- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree);
|
||||
+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
|
||||
+ int extra_data);
|
||||
void ossl_policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node);
|
||||
int ossl_policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl,
|
||||
const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid);
|
||||
diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
|
||||
index 9d9a7ea179..450f95a655 100644
|
||||
--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
|
||||
+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
|
||||
@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
|
||||
X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
|
||||
X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
|
||||
X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
|
||||
- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
|
||||
+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
|
||||
+ int extra_data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
X509_POLICY_NODE *node;
|
||||
|
||||
+ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */
|
||||
+ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum)
|
||||
+ return NULL;
|
||||
+
|
||||
node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node));
|
||||
if (node == NULL) {
|
||||
ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509V3, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
|
||||
@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
|
||||
}
|
||||
node->data = data;
|
||||
node->parent = parent;
|
||||
- if (level) {
|
||||
+ if (level != NULL) {
|
||||
if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) {
|
||||
if (level->anyPolicy)
|
||||
goto node_error;
|
||||
@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
- if (tree) {
|
||||
+ if (extra_data) {
|
||||
if (tree->extra_data == NULL)
|
||||
tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null();
|
||||
if (tree->extra_data == NULL){
|
||||
@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+ tree->node_count++;
|
||||
if (parent)
|
||||
parent->nchild++;
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
|
||||
index fa45da5117..f953a05a41 100644
|
||||
--- a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
|
||||
+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
|
||||
@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#include "pcy_local.h"
|
||||
|
||||
+/*
|
||||
+ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to
|
||||
+ * a generous default of 1000 nodes.
|
||||
+ *
|
||||
+ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the
|
||||
+ * door on CVE-2023-0464.
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX
|
||||
+# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000
|
||||
+#endif
|
||||
+
|
||||
static void expected_print(BIO *channel,
|
||||
X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lev, X509_POLICY_NODE *node,
|
||||
int indent)
|
||||
@@ -163,6 +174,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
|
||||
return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */
|
||||
+ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX;
|
||||
+
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3.
|
||||
*
|
||||
@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
|
||||
if ((data = ossl_policy_data_new(NULL,
|
||||
OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL)
|
||||
goto bad_tree;
|
||||
- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) {
|
||||
+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) {
|
||||
ossl_policy_data_free(data);
|
||||
goto bad_tree;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -239,7 +253,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
|
||||
* Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
|
||||
- X509_POLICY_DATA *data)
|
||||
+ X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
|
||||
+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
|
||||
{
|
||||
X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1;
|
||||
int i, matched = 0;
|
||||
@@ -249,13 +264,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
|
||||
X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ossl_policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) {
|
||||
- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL)
|
||||
+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
matched = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) {
|
||||
- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
|
||||
+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
@@ -268,7 +283,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
|
||||
* Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
|
||||
- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache)
|
||||
+ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache,
|
||||
+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -276,7 +292,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
|
||||
X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Look for matching nodes in previous level */
|
||||
- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data))
|
||||
+ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
|
||||
/* Curr may not have anyPolicy */
|
||||
data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set;
|
||||
data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS;
|
||||
- if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) {
|
||||
+ if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) {
|
||||
ossl_policy_data_free(data);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
|
||||
/* Finally add link to anyPolicy */
|
||||
if (last->anyPolicy &&
|
||||
ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy,
|
||||
- last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
|
||||
+ last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -553,7 +569,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
|
||||
extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS
|
||||
| POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE;
|
||||
node = ossl_policy_level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent,
|
||||
- tree);
|
||||
+ tree, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!tree->user_policies) {
|
||||
tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null();
|
||||
@@ -580,7 +596,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) {
|
||||
cache = ossl_policy_cache_set(curr->cert);
|
||||
- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache))
|
||||
+ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree))
|
||||
return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY)
|
@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
commit 1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb
|
||||
Author: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
||||
Date: Tue Mar 7 16:52:55 2023 +0000
|
||||
|
||||
Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf certs
|
||||
|
||||
Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we
|
||||
later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf
|
||||
cert was bad.
|
||||
|
||||
Fixes: CVE-2023-0465
|
||||
|
||||
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
|
||||
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
|
||||
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20587)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
|
||||
index 9384f1da9b..a0282c3ef1 100644
|
||||
--- a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
|
||||
+++ b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
|
||||
@@ -1654,15 +1654,23 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx)
|
||||
goto memerr;
|
||||
/* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */
|
||||
if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) {
|
||||
- int i;
|
||||
+ int i, cbcalled = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */
|
||||
- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
|
||||
+ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
|
||||
X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i);
|
||||
|
||||
+ if ((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0)
|
||||
+ cbcalled = 1;
|
||||
CB_FAIL_IF((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0,
|
||||
ctx, x, i, X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION);
|
||||
}
|
||||
+ if (!cbcalled) {
|
||||
+ /* Should not be able to get here */
|
||||
+ ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR);
|
||||
+ return 0;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
+ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) {
|
@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
commit 51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908
|
||||
Author: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
|
||||
Date: Tue Mar 21 16:15:47 2023 +0100
|
||||
|
||||
Fix documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy()
|
||||
|
||||
The function was incorrectly documented as enabling policy checking.
|
||||
|
||||
Fixes: CVE-2023-0466
|
||||
|
||||
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
||||
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
|
||||
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20563)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
|
||||
index 75a1677022..43c1900bca 100644
|
||||
--- a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
|
||||
+++ b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
|
||||
@@ -98,8 +98,9 @@ B<trust>.
|
||||
X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_time() sets the verification time in B<param> to
|
||||
B<t>. Normally the current time is used.
|
||||
|
||||
-X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() enables policy checking (it is disabled
|
||||
-by default) and adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set.
|
||||
+X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set.
|
||||
+Contrary to preexisting documentation of this function it does not enable
|
||||
+policy checking.
|
||||
|
||||
X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() enables policy checking (it is disabled
|
||||
by default) and sets the acceptable policy set to B<policies>. Any existing
|
||||
@@ -400,6 +401,10 @@ The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_hostflags() function was added in OpenSSL 1.1.0i.
|
||||
The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_host(), X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_email(),
|
||||
and X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get1_ip_asc() functions were added in OpenSSL 3.0.
|
||||
|
||||
+The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() was historically documented as
|
||||
+enabling policy checking however the implementation has never done this.
|
||||
+The documentation was changed to align with the implementation.
|
||||
+
|
||||
=head1 COPYRIGHT
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright 2009-2023 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.
|
@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
||||
commit 02ac9c9420275868472f33b01def01218742b8bb
|
||||
Author: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
|
||||
Date: Mon Apr 17 16:51:20 2023 +0200
|
||||
|
||||
aesv8-armx.pl: Avoid buffer overrread in AES-XTS decryption
|
||||
|
||||
Original author: Nevine Ebeid (Amazon)
|
||||
Fixes: CVE-2023-1255
|
||||
|
||||
The buffer overread happens on decrypts of 4 mod 5 sizes.
|
||||
Unless the memory just after the buffer is unmapped this is harmless.
|
||||
|
||||
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
|
||||
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
|
||||
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20759)
|
||||
|
||||
(cherry picked from commit 72dfe46550ee1f1bbfacd49f071419365bc23304)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl b/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl
|
||||
index 6a7bf05d1b..bd583e2c89 100755
|
||||
--- a/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl
|
||||
+++ b/crypto/aes/asm/aesv8-armx.pl
|
||||
@@ -3353,7 +3353,7 @@ $code.=<<___ if ($flavour =~ /64/);
|
||||
.align 4
|
||||
.Lxts_dec_tail4x:
|
||||
add $inp,$inp,#16
|
||||
- vld1.32 {$dat0},[$inp],#16
|
||||
+ tst $tailcnt,#0xf
|
||||
veor $tmp1,$dat1,$tmp0
|
||||
vst1.8 {$tmp1},[$out],#16
|
||||
veor $tmp2,$dat2,$tmp2
|
||||
@@ -3362,6 +3362,8 @@ $code.=<<___ if ($flavour =~ /64/);
|
||||
veor $tmp4,$dat4,$tmp4
|
||||
vst1.8 {$tmp3-$tmp4},[$out],#32
|
||||
|
||||
+ b.eq .Lxts_dec_abort
|
||||
+ vld1.32 {$dat0},[$inp],#16
|
||||
b .Lxts_done
|
||||
.align 4
|
||||
.Lxts_outer_dec_tail:
|
@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
https://bugs.gentoo.org/894140
|
||||
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/20214
|
||||
|
||||
From d500b51791cd56e73065e3a7f4487fc33f31c91c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
|
||||
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 17:56:58 -0500
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] Fix Configure test for -mips in CFLAGS
|
||||
|
||||
We want to add -mips2 or -mips3 only if the user hasn't already
|
||||
specified a mips version in CFLAGS. The existing test was a
|
||||
double-negative.
|
||||
|
||||
Fixes: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/20214
|
||||
---
|
||||
Configure | 2 +-
|
||||
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/Configure b/Configure
|
||||
index b6bbec0a85c4..ec48614d6b99 100755
|
||||
--- a/Configure
|
||||
+++ b/Configure
|
||||
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ if ($target =~ /^mingw/ && `$config{CC} --target-help 2>&1` =~ m/-mno-cygwin/m)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ($target =~ /linux.*-mips/ && !$disabled{asm}
|
||||
- && !grep { $_ !~ /-m(ips|arch=)/ } (@{$config{CFLAGS}})) {
|
||||
+ && !grep { $_ =~ /-m(ips|arch=)/ } (@{$config{CFLAGS}})) {
|
||||
# minimally required architecture flags for assembly modules
|
||||
my $value;
|
||||
$value = '-mips2' if ($target =~ /mips32/);
|
@ -19,8 +19,7 @@ if [[ ${PV} == 9999 ]] ; then
|
||||
else
|
||||
SRC_URI="mirror://openssl/source/${MY_P}.tar.gz
|
||||
verify-sig? ( mirror://openssl/source/${MY_P}.tar.gz.asc )"
|
||||
#KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~hppa ~ia64 ~m68k ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~riscv ~s390 ~sparc ~x86 ~x86-linux"
|
||||
KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 ~arm arm64 ~hppa ~ia64 ~loong ~m68k ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~riscv ~s390 ~sparc ~x86"
|
||||
KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 ~arm arm64 ~hppa ~ia64 ~loong ~m68k ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~riscv ~s390 ~sparc ~x86 ~arm64-macos"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
S="${WORKDIR}"/${MY_P}
|
||||
@ -55,6 +54,14 @@ MULTILIB_WRAPPED_HEADERS=(
|
||||
/usr/include/openssl/configuration.h
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
PATCHES=(
|
||||
"${FILESDIR}"/openssl-3.0.8-mips-cflags.patch
|
||||
"${FILESDIR}"/openssl-3.0.8-CVE-2023-0464.patch
|
||||
"${FILESDIR}"/openssl-3.0.8-CVE-2023-0465.patch
|
||||
"${FILESDIR}"/openssl-3.0.8-CVE-2023-0466.patch
|
||||
"${FILESDIR}"/openssl-3.0.8-CVE-2023-1255.patch
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
pkg_setup() {
|
||||
if use ktls ; then
|
||||
if kernel_is -lt 4 18 ; then
|
||||
@ -93,13 +100,6 @@ src_unpack() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
src_prepare() {
|
||||
# Allow openssl to be cross-compiled
|
||||
cp "${FILESDIR}"/gentoo.config-1.0.4 gentoo.config || die
|
||||
chmod a+rx gentoo.config || die
|
||||
|
||||
# Keep this in sync with app-misc/c_rehash
|
||||
SSL_CNF_DIR="/etc/ssl"
|
||||
|
||||
# Make sure we only ever touch Makefile.org and avoid patching a file
|
||||
# that gets blown away anyways by the Configure script in src_configure
|
||||
rm -f Makefile
|
||||
@ -117,6 +117,14 @@ src_prepare() {
|
||||
rm test/recipes/80-test_ssl_new.t || die
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
# Test fails depending on kernel configuration, bug #699134
|
||||
rm test/recipes/30-test_afalg.t || die
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
src_configure() {
|
||||
# Keep this in sync with app-misc/c_rehash
|
||||
SSL_CNF_DIR="/etc/ssl"
|
||||
|
||||
# Quiet out unknown driver argument warnings since openssl
|
||||
# doesn't have well-split CFLAGS and we're making it even worse
|
||||
# and 'make depend' uses -Werror for added fun (bug #417795 again)
|
||||
@ -132,17 +140,13 @@ src_prepare() {
|
||||
# Don't remove the no strict aliasing bits below!
|
||||
filter-flags -fstrict-aliasing
|
||||
append-flags -fno-strict-aliasing
|
||||
# The OpenSSL developers don't test with LTO right now, it leads to various
|
||||
# warnings/errors (which may or may not be false positives), it's considered
|
||||
# unsupported, and it's not tested in CI: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18663.
|
||||
filter-lto
|
||||
|
||||
append-flags $(test-flags-CC -Wa,--noexecstack)
|
||||
|
||||
local sslout=$(./gentoo.config)
|
||||
einfo "Using configuration: ${sslout:-(openssl knows best)}"
|
||||
edo perl Configure ${sslout} --test-sanity
|
||||
|
||||
multilib_copy_sources
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
multilib_src_configure() {
|
||||
# bug #197996
|
||||
unset APPS
|
||||
# bug #312551
|
||||
@ -152,6 +156,10 @@ multilib_src_configure() {
|
||||
|
||||
tc-export AR CC CXX RANLIB RC
|
||||
|
||||
multilib-minimal_src_configure
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
multilib_src_configure() {
|
||||
use_ssl() { usex $1 "enable-${2:-$1}" "no-${2:-$1}" " ${*:3}" ; }
|
||||
|
||||
local krb5=$(has_version app-crypt/mit-krb5 && echo "MIT" || echo "Heimdal")
|
||||
@ -168,7 +176,7 @@ multilib_src_configure() {
|
||||
# ec_nistp_64_gcc_128="enable-ec_nistp_64_gcc_128"
|
||||
#fi
|
||||
|
||||
local sslout=$(./gentoo.config)
|
||||
local sslout=$(bash "${FILESDIR}/gentoo.config-1.0.4")
|
||||
einfo "Using configuration: ${sslout:-(openssl knows best)}"
|
||||
|
||||
# https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/INSTALL.md#enable-and-disable-features
|
||||
@ -202,7 +210,7 @@ multilib_src_configure() {
|
||||
threads
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
edo perl Configure "${myeconfargs[@]}"
|
||||
edo perl "${S}/Configure" "${myeconfargs[@]}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
multilib_src_compile() {
|
||||
@ -223,6 +231,8 @@ multilib_src_install() {
|
||||
emake DESTDIR="${D}" install_sw
|
||||
if use fips; then
|
||||
emake DESTDIR="${D}" install_fips
|
||||
# Regen this in pkg_preinst, bug 900625
|
||||
rm "${ED}${SSL_CNF_DIR}"/fipsmodule.cnf || die
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
if multilib_is_native_abi; then
|
||||
@ -263,3 +273,15 @@ multilib_src_install_all() {
|
||||
# flatcar changes: package `tmpfiles.d` setup for SDK bootstrapping.
|
||||
systemd-tmpfiles --create --root="${ED}" "${FILESDIR}"/openssl.conf
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pkg_preinst() {
|
||||
if use fips; then
|
||||
# Regen fipsmodule.cnf, bug 900625
|
||||
ebegin "Running openssl fipsinstall"
|
||||
"${ED}/usr/bin/openssl" fipsinstall -quiet \
|
||||
-out "${ED}${SSL_CNF_DIR}/fipsmodule.cnf" \
|
||||
-module "${ED}/usr/$(get_libdir)/ossl-modules/fips.so"
|
||||
eend $?
|
||||
fi
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user