@mitchellh suggested we fork `cli` and switch to that.
Since we primarily use the interfaces in `cli`, and the new
fork has not changed those, this is (mostly) a drop-in replacement.
A small fix will be necessary for Vault Enterprise, I believe.
* Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package.
This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository.
* Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package.
This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository.
* Updating the license from MPL to Business Source License.
Going forward, this project will be licensed under the Business Source License v1.1. Please see our blog post for more details at https://hashi.co/bsl-blog, FAQ at www.hashicorp.com/licensing-faq, and details of the license at www.hashicorp.com/bsl.
* add missing license headers
* Update copyright file headers to BUS-1.1
* Fix test that expected exact offset on hcl file
---------
Co-authored-by: hashicorp-copywrite[bot] <110428419+hashicorp-copywrite[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sarah Thompson <sthompson@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Brian Kassouf <bkassouf@hashicorp.com>
Running 'vault auth' with no parameters was panicking:
panic: assignment to entry in nil map
github.com/hashicorp/vault/command/login.go:255 +0xdee
Now it will show help.
* Add basic autocompletion
* Add autocomplete to some common commands
* Autocomplete the generate-root flags
* Add information about autocomplete to the docs
* Normalize "X arguments expected" messages
* Use "Vault" when referring to the product and "vault" when referring to an instance of the product
* Various minor tweaks to improve readability and/or provide clarity
This came up twice, in two different training courses. The UX is a
little confusing here on the CLI. Users are used to running:
$ vault auth abcd-1234...
So when they auth using a method, the output leads them to believe the
need to "re-auth" as the generated token:
$ vault auth -method=userpass username=foo password=bar
Successfully authenticated!
token: defg-5678...
A number of users then run:
$ vault auth defg-5678
I've added some helpful text to hint this is not required if the method
is not "token".
This makes `vault auth` work as documented:
> If no -method is specified, then the token is expected. If it is not
> given on the command-line, it will be asked via user input. If the
> token is "-", it will be read from stdin.
