* Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package.
This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository.
* Adding explicit MPL license for sub-package.
This directory and its subdirectories (packages) contain files licensed with the MPLv2 `LICENSE` file in this directory and are intentionally licensed separately from the BSL `LICENSE` file at the root of this repository.
* Updating the license from MPL to Business Source License.
Going forward, this project will be licensed under the Business Source License v1.1. Please see our blog post for more details at https://hashi.co/bsl-blog, FAQ at www.hashicorp.com/licensing-faq, and details of the license at www.hashicorp.com/bsl.
* add missing license headers
* Update copyright file headers to BUS-1.1
* Fix test that expected exact offset on hcl file
---------
Co-authored-by: hashicorp-copywrite[bot] <110428419+hashicorp-copywrite[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sarah Thompson <sthompson@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Brian Kassouf <bkassouf@hashicorp.com>
* CreateOperation should only be implemented alongside ExistenceCheck
Closes#12329
Vault treats all POST or PUT HTTP requests equally - they default to
being treated as UpdateOperations, but, if a backend implements an
ExistenceCheck function, CreateOperations can be separated out when the
existence check returns false.
It follows, then, that if a CreateOperation handler is implemented
without an ExistenceCheck function, this is unreachable code - a coding
error. It's a fairly minor error in the grand scheme of things, but it
causes the generated OpenAPI spec to include x-vault-createSupported for
operations on which create can never actually be invoked - and promotes
muddled understanding of the create/update feature.
In this PR:
1) Implement a new test, which checks all builtin auth methods and
secrets engines can be successfully initialized. (This is important
to validate the next part.)
2) Expand upon the existing coding error checks built in to
framework.Backend, adding a check for this misuse of CreateOperation.
3) Fix up instances of improper CreateOperation within the Vault
repository - just two, transit and mock.
Note: At this point, the newly added test will **fail**.
There are improper uses of CreateOperation in all of the following:
vault-plugin-auth-cf
vault-plugin-auth-kerberos
vault-plugin-auth-kubernetes
vault-plugin-secrets-ad
vault-plugin-secrets-gcpkms
vault-plugin-secrets-kubernetes
vault-plugin-secrets-kv
vault-plugin-secrets-openldap
vault-plugin-secrets-terraform
each of which needs to be fixed and updated in go.mod here, before this
new check can be added.
* Add subtests
* Add in testing of KV v2, which otherwise doesn't get tested
This is a surprisingly complicated special case
* The database plugin needs special handling as well, and add in help invocations of the builtin backends too
* Fix extra package prefix
* Add changelog
* Update 6 out of 9 plugins to needed new versions
Note, this IS an upgrade despite the apparent version numbers going
down. (That's a consequence of slightly odd release management occurring
in the plugin repositories.)
* Update to deal with code changes since branch originally created
* Perform necessary update of vault-plugin-secrets-kubernetes so that CI checks on PR can run
* Fix another instance of incorrect CreateOperation, for a test-only endpoint
By being hidden behind a Go build constraint, it had evaded notice until
now.
* Add an opportunistic test of sys/internal/specs/openapi too
