For nearly all commands in U-Boot the '?' variable is handled the same
way with 0 meaning success, 1 meaning any failure. Explain this in the
general rules section of the cmdline documentation (with a link to a
counter example) and then remove the redundant wording from most
commands. We retain a section about the return value in a number of
places where we are doing something such as always returning a specific
value or we have useful additional information to go along with the
normal return codes.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
A few lines of code being guarded by the CONFIG_TFTP_PORT option seems
an unnecessary restriction on the TFTP support provided by a vanilla
U-Boot image. In cases where the TFTP server cannot run as superuser -
and hence cannot run on the well-known port 69 - this quirk incurs a
full reconfiguration and rebuild of the bootloader only in order to
select the appropriate destination port.
Remove the CONFIG_TFTP_PORT option entirely and make the tftpdstp and
tftpsrcp variables always have an effect. Their being unset will mean
that U-Boot behaves the same as if CONFIG_TFTP_PORT was unset. Update
the documentation accordingly. And fix up the single board which was
originally enabling this option.
Signed-off-by: Alvin Šipraga <alvin@pqrs.dk>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
Documentation:
* man-page for tftpput
UEFI:
* fix driver binding protocol for block IO devices
* don't delete invalid handles
* add a unit test for the EFI Conformance Profile Table
Other:
* correct short text for tftpboot
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=1zZW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'efi-2022-10-rc5' of https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi
Pull request for efi-2022-10-rc5
Documentation:
* man-page for tftpput
UEFI:
* fix driver binding protocol for block IO devices
* don't delete invalid handles
* add a unit test for the EFI Conformance Profile Table
Other:
* correct short text for tftpboot
Provide a man-page for the tftpput command.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
