clk: k210: Fix checking if ulongs are less than 0

The PLL functions take ulong arguments for rate, but still check if that
rate is negative (which is never true). The correct way to handle this is
to use IS_ERR_VALUE (like is already done in k210_clk_set_rate). While
we're at it, we can move the error checking up into the caller of the pll
set/get rate functions.  This also protects our other calculations from
using bogus values for rate.

Fixes: 609bd60b94 ("clk: k210: Rewrite to remove CCF")
Reported-by: Coverity Scan <scan-admin@coverity.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
This commit is contained in:
Sean Anderson 2021-09-11 13:20:00 -04:00 committed by Leo Yu-Chi Liang
parent ea67f467a4
commit 54d5d2d56b

View File

@ -849,9 +849,6 @@ static ulong k210_pll_set_rate(struct k210_clk_priv *priv, int id, ulong rate,
u32 reg;
ulong calc_rate;
if (rate_in < 0)
return rate_in;
err = k210_pll_calc_config(rate, rate_in, &config);
if (err)
return err;
@ -895,7 +892,7 @@ static ulong k210_pll_get_rate(struct k210_clk_priv *priv, int id,
u64 r, f, od;
u32 reg = readl(priv->base + k210_plls[id].off);
if (rate_in < 0 || (reg & K210_PLL_BYPASS))
if (reg & K210_PLL_BYPASS)
return rate_in;
if (!(reg & K210_PLL_PWRD))
@ -1029,6 +1026,8 @@ static ulong do_k210_clk_get_rate(struct k210_clk_priv *priv, int id)
parent = k210_clk_get_parent(priv, id);
parent_rate = do_k210_clk_get_rate(priv, parent);
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(parent_rate))
return parent_rate;
if (k210_clks[id].flags & K210_CLKF_PLL)
return k210_pll_get_rate(priv, k210_clks[id].pll, parent_rate);
@ -1099,6 +1098,8 @@ static ulong k210_clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
parent = k210_clk_get_parent(priv, clk->id);
rate_in = do_k210_clk_get_rate(priv, parent);
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(rate_in))
return rate_in;
log_debug("id=%ld rate=%lu rate_in=%lu\n", clk->id, rate, rate_in);