4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Andrey Smirnov
a068acfbe4 feat: split routerd from apid
New service `routerd` performs exactly single task: based on incoming
API call service name, it routes the requests to the appropriate Talos
service (`networkd`, `osd`, etc.) Service `routerd` listens of file
socket and routes requests to file sockets.

Service `apid` now does single task as well:

* it either fans out request to other `apid` services running on other
nodes and aggregates responses
* or it forwards requests to local `routerd` (when request destination
is local node)

Cons:

* one more proxying layer on request path

Pros:

* more clear service roles
* `routerd` is part of core Talos, services should register with it to
expose their API; no auth in the service (not exposed to the world)
* `apid` might be replaced with other implementation, it depends on TLS infra,
auth, etc.
* `apid` is better segregated from other Talos services (can only access
`routerd`, can't talk to other Talos services directly, so less exposure
in case of a bug)

This change is no-op to the end users.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <smirnov.andrey@gmail.com>
2020-03-05 22:05:56 +03:00
Andrew Rynhard
ad863a7f92 refactor: rename protobuf services, RPCs, and messages
This PR brings our protobuf files into conformance with the protobuf
style guide, and community conventions. It is purely renames, along with
generated docs.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Rynhard <andrew@andrewrynhard.com>
2019-12-11 11:41:40 -08:00
Andrey Smirnov
399aeda0b9 feat: rename confusing target options, --endpoints, etc.
Fixes #1610

1. In `talosconfig`, deprecate `Target` in favor of `Endpoints`
(client-side LB to come next).

2. In `osctl`, use `--nodes` in place of `--target`.

3. In `osctl` add option `--endpoints` to override `Endpoints` for the
call.

Other changes are just updates to catch up with the changes. Most
probably I missed something... And CAPI provider needs update.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <smirnov.andrey@gmail.com>
2019-12-10 02:23:54 +03:00
Andrey Smirnov
5b7bea2471 feat: use grpc-proxy in apid
This replaces codegen version of apid proxying with
talos-systems/grpc-proxy based version. Proxying is transparent, it
doesn't require exact information about methods and response types. It
requires some common layout response to enhance it properly with node
metadata or errors.

There should be no signifcant changes to the API with the previous
version, but it's worth mentioning a few changes:

1. grpc.ClientConn is established just once per upstream (either local
service or remote apid instance).

2. When called without `-t` (`targets`), apid proxies immediately down
to local service skipping proxying to itself (as before), which results
in empty node metadata in response (before it had local node IP). Might
revert this later to proxy to itself (?).

3. Streaming APIs are now fully supported with multiple targets, but
message definition doesn't contain `ResponseMetadata`, so streaming APIs
are broken now with targets (needs a fix).

4. Errors are now returned as responses with `Error` field set in
`ResponseMetadata`, this requires client library update and `osctl` to
handle it properly.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <smirnov.andrey@gmail.com>
2019-11-29 22:57:25 +03:00