mirrors/prometheus
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus.git synced 2025-08-06 14:17:12 +02:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

promql: typo fix in comment

Browse Source 
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
This commit is contained in:
beorn7 2025-06-10 22:06:04 +02:00
parent c3da460474
commit 68b1bcc648
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
promql/functions.go
View File

@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ func funcAvgOverTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNode
// https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61665473/is-it-beneficial-for-precision-to-calculate-the-incremental-mean-average
// Additional note: For even better numerical accuracy, we would need to
// process the values in a particular order. For avg_over_time, that
// would be more or less feasible, but it would be more expensivo, and
// would be more or less feasible, but it would be more expensive, and
// it would also be much harder for the avg aggregator, given how the
// PromQL engine works.
if len(firstSeries.Floats) == 0 {

4
promql/promqltest/testdata/functions.test vendored
View File

@ -1086,8 +1086,8 @@ load 5s
# relevant this scenario is.
# eval instant at 55s avg_over_time(metric11[1m])
# {} -44.848083237000004 <- This is the correct value.
# {} -1.881783551706252e+203 <- This is the relust on linux/amd64.
# {} 2.303079268822384e+202 <- This is the relust on darwin/arm64.
# {} -1.881783551706252e+203 <- This is the result on linux/amd64.
# {} 2.303079268822384e+202 <- This is the result on darwin/arm64.
# Test per-series aggregation on dense samples.
clear