Upon congestion events (for a instance packet loss),
bbr_adapt_lower_bounds_from_congestion() role is to adapt some BBR internal
variables in relation with the estimated bandwidth (BBR.bw).
According to the BBR v3 draft, this function should do nothing
if BBRIsProbingBW() pseudo-code returns true. That said, this function
is not defined by the BBR v3 draft. But according to this part mentioned before
defining the pseudo-code for BBRAdaptLowerBoundsFromCongestion():
4.5.10.3. When not Probing for Bandwidth
When not explicitly accelerating to probe for bandwidth (Drain, ProbeRTT,
ProbeBW_DOWN, ProbeBW_CRUISE), BBR responds to loss by slowing down to some extent.
This is because loss suggests that the available bandwidth and safe volume of
in-flight data may have decreased recently, and the flow needs to adapt, slowing
down toward the latest delivery process. BBR flows implement this response by
reducing the short-term model parameters, BBR.bw_lo and BBR.inflight_lo.
BBRIsProbingBW() should concern the accelerating probe for bandwidth states
which are BBR_ST_PROBE_BW_REFILL and BBR_ST_PROBE_BW_UP.
Adapt the code to match this latter assumption. At least this reduce
drastically the packet loss volumes at least during ProbeBW_CRUISE.
As an example, on a 100MBits/s internet link with ~94ms as RTT, before
this patch, 4329640 sent packets were needed with 1617119 lost packets (!!!) to
download a 3GB object. After this patch, 2843952 sent packets vs 144134 lost packets
are needed. There may be some packet loss issue. I suspect the maximum bandwidth
which may be overestimated. More this is the case, more the packet loss is big.
That said, at this time, it remains below 5% depending on the size of the objects,
5% being for more than 2GB objects.
Must be backported to 3.1.
9813de0537