mirror of
https://git.haproxy.org/git/haproxy.git/
synced 2025-09-20 21:31:28 +02:00
f87cf8b76e
stktable_trash_oldest() does insist a lot on purging what was requested,
only limited by STKTABLE_MAX_UPDATES_AT_ONCE. This is called in two
conditions, one to allocate a new stksess, and the other one to purge
entries of a stopping process. The cost of iterating over all shards
is huge, and a shard lock is taken each time before looking up entries.
Moreover, multiple threads can end up doing the same and looking hard for
many entries to purge when only one is needed. Furthermore, all threads
start from the same shard, hence synchronize their locks. All of this
costs a lot to other operations such as access from peers.
This commit simplifies the approach by ignoring the budget, starting
from a random shard number, and using a trylock so as to be able to
give up early in case of contention. The approach chosen here consists
in trying hard to flush at least one entry, but once at least one is
evicted or at least one trylock failed, then a failure on the trylock
will result in finishing.
The function now returns a success as long as one entry was freed.
With this, tests no longer show watchdog warnings during tests, though
a few still remain when stopping the tests (which are not related to
this function but to the contention from process_table_expire()).
With this change, under high contention some entries' purge might be
postponed and the table may occasionally contain slightly more entries
than their size (though this already happens since stksess_new() first
increments ->current before decrementing it).
Measures were made on a 64-core system with 8 peers
of 16 threads each, at CPU saturation (350k req/s each doing 10
track-sc) for 10M req, with 3 different approaches:
- this one resulted in 1500 failures to find an entry (0.015%
size overhead), with the lowest contention and the fairest
peers distibution.
- leaving only after a success resulted in 229 failures (0.0029%
size overhead) but doubled the time spent in the function (on
the write lock precisely).
- leaving only when both a success and a failed lock were met
resulted in 31 failures (0.00031% overhead) but the contention
was high enough again so that peers were not all up to date.
Considering that a saturated machine might exceed its entries by
0.015% is pretty minimal, the mechanism is kept.
This should be backported to 3.2 after a bit more testing as it
resolves some watchdog warnings and panics. It requires precedent
commit "MINOR: stick-table: permit stksess_new() to temporarily
allocate more entries" to over-allocate instead of failing in case
of contention.