Server tracking uses the same "tracknext" list for servers tracking
another one and for the servers being tracked. This caused an issue
which was fixed by commit f39c71c ([CRITICAL] fix server state tracking:
it was O(n!) instead of O(n)), consisting in ensuring that a server is
being checked before walking down the list, so that we don't propagate
the up/down information via servers being part of the track chain.
But the root cause is the fact that all servers share the same list.
The correct solution consists in having a list head for the tracked
servers and a list of next tracking servers. This simplifies the
propagation logic, especially for the case where status changes might
be passed to individual servers via the CLI.
1a53a3af13