With a single process, we don't need to USE_PRIVATE_CACHE, USE_FUTEX
nor USE_PTHREAD_PSHARED anymore. Let's only keep the basic spinlock
to lock between threads.
Since threads were introduced in 1.8, the USE_PRIVATE_CACHE mode of the
shctx was not updated to use locks. Originally it was meant to disable
sharing between processes, so it removes the lock/unlock instructions.
But with threads enabled, it's not possible to work like this anymore.
It's easy to see that once built with private cache and threads enabled,
sending violent SSL traffic to the the process instantly makes it die.
The HTTP cache is very likely affected as well.
This patch addresses this by falling back to our native spinlocks when
USE_PRIVATE_CACHE is used. In practice we could use them also for other
modes and remove all older implementations, but this patch aims at keeping
the changes very low and easy to backport. A new SHCTX_LOCK label was
added to help with debugging, but OTHER_LOCK might be usable as well
for backports.
An even lighter approach for backports may consist in always declaring
the lock (or reusing "waiters"), and calling pl_take_s() for the lock()
and pl_drop_s() for the unlock() operation. This could even be used in
all modes (process and threads), even when thread support is disabled.
Subsequent patches will further clean up this area.
This patch must be backported to all supported versions since 1.8.
The current "ADD" vs "ADDQ" is confusing because when thinking in terms
of appending at the end of a list, "ADD" naturally comes to mind, but
here it does the opposite, it inserts. Several times already it's been
incorrectly used where ADDQ was expected, the latest of which was a
fortunate accident explained in 6fa922562 ("CLEANUP: stream: explain
why we queue the stream at the head of the server list").
Let's use more explicit (but slightly longer) names now:
LIST_ADD -> LIST_INSERT
LIST_ADDQ -> LIST_APPEND
LIST_ADDED -> LIST_INLIST
LIST_DEL -> LIST_DELETE
The same is true for MT_LISTs, including their "TRY" variant.
LIST_DEL_INIT keeps its short name to encourage to use it instead of the
lazier LIST_DELETE which is often less safe.
The change is large (~674 non-comment entries) but is mechanical enough
to remain safe. No permutation was performed, so any out-of-tree code
can easily map older names to new ones.
The list doc was updated.
