From cbc8e1394da9acb215463de717dcc8ced798ee88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aurelien DARRAGON Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:31:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] MINOR: log: change wording in lf_expr_postcheck() error message logformat_node was referenced as "node" in the error message reported to the user, but in fact it is referred to as "item" in user documentation. Using "item" in the error message to better comply with the doc. Error message was introduced with 7a21c3a4ef ("MAJOR: log: implement proper postparsing for logformat expressions") --- src/log.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/log.c b/src/log.c index 5e78b760f..30274b984 100644 --- a/src/log.c +++ b/src/log.c @@ -1008,7 +1008,7 @@ int lf_expr_postcheck(struct lf_expr *lf_expr, struct proxy *px, char **err) } if ((px->to_log & (LW_REQ | LW_RESP)) && (px->mode != PR_MODE_HTTP && !(px->options & PR_O_HTTP_UPG))) { - memprintf(err, "logformat expression not usable here (at least one node depends on HTTP mode)"); + memprintf(err, "logformat expression not usable here (at least one item depends on HTTP mode)"); goto fail; }