Krzesimir Nowak b23e28caff sec-policy/selinux-sssd: Downgrade to match other SELinux packages ... It was my mistake during the review to allow adding a package that is much newer than the other SELinux packages we currently have. And for some reason I started getting build failures when updating packages from 2020: !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sec-policy/selinux-base-policy-2.20210908-r1" for /build/amd64-usr/ have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - sec-policy/selinux-base-policy-9999::coreos (masked by: missing keyword) (dependency required by "sec-policy/selinux-sssd-2.20210908-r1::portage-stable" [ebuild]) (dependency required by "sys-auth/sssd-2.3.1-r4::coreos[selinux]" [ebuild]) (dependency required by "app-admin/sudo-1.9.5_p2::coreos[sssd]" [ebuild]) (dependency required by "coreos-base/coreos-0.0.1-r302::coreos" [ebuild]) (dependency required by "coreos-base/coreos-dev-0.1.0-r81::coreos" [ebuild]) (dependency required by "coreos-devel/board-packages-0.0.1-r9::coreos" [ebuild]) (dependency required by "coreos-devel/board-packages" [argument]) It's from gentoo commit 1f7a3661f47b4da14ac3ad8c85f54f6b144104e4.		2022-03-30 19:53:11 +02:00
..
src/third_party/portage-stable	sec-policy/selinux-sssd: Downgrade to match other SELinux packages	2022-03-30 19:53:11 +02:00