From cc8f07769e5b4fd0c01fd2f6c42a7d6ef301b4fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mathieu Tortuyaux Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:27:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] virtual/perl-File-Temp: remove ebuild it's not necessary with `minimal` dev-lang/perl Signed-off-by: Mathieu Tortuyaux --- .../virtual/perl-File-Temp/metadata.xml | 8 -------- .../perl-File-Temp-0.230.400-r5.ebuild | 16 ---------------- 2 files changed, 24 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/virtual/perl-File-Temp/metadata.xml delete mode 100644 sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/virtual/perl-File-Temp/perl-File-Temp-0.230.400-r5.ebuild diff --git a/sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/virtual/perl-File-Temp/metadata.xml b/sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/virtual/perl-File-Temp/metadata.xml deleted file mode 100644 index 2b9a936fc0..0000000000 --- a/sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/virtual/perl-File-Temp/metadata.xml +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ - - - - - perl@gentoo.org - Gentoo Perl Project - - diff --git a/sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/virtual/perl-File-Temp/perl-File-Temp-0.230.400-r5.ebuild b/sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/virtual/perl-File-Temp/perl-File-Temp-0.230.400-r5.ebuild deleted file mode 100644 index 4158ed8fe5..0000000000 --- a/sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/virtual/perl-File-Temp/perl-File-Temp-0.230.400-r5.ebuild +++ /dev/null @@ -1,16 +0,0 @@ -# Copyright 1999-2018 Gentoo Foundation -# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 - -EAPI=6 - -DESCRIPTION="Virtual for ${PN#perl-}" -SLOT="0" -KEYWORDS="alpha amd64 arm arm64 hppa ia64 m68k ~mips ppc ppc64 s390 sh sparc x86 ~ppc-aix ~x64-cygwin ~amd64-fbsd ~x86-fbsd ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux ~ppc-macos ~x64-macos ~x86-macos ~m68k-mint ~sparc-solaris ~sparc64-solaris ~x64-solaris ~x86-solaris" - -RDEPEND=" - ~perl-core/${PN#perl-}-${PV} - !=perl-core/File-Temp-0.230.400 - dev-lang/perl:= -" - -# this is the dev-lang/perl-5.20, 5.22, 5.24, 5.26, 5.28 version but we need the security patch