From 36e481faa2efd30fb60112028ae3689f06418969 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Flatcar Buildbot Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 07:10:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] sys-devel/binutils: Sync with Gentoo It's from Gentoo commit ce82b1fccf6e1149c6213d1079d8258e5de74d11. --- .../sys-devel/binutils/binutils-9999.ebuild | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-9999.ebuild b/sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-9999.ebuild index 1593824987..bf8d3eccb2 100644 --- a/sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-9999.ebuild +++ b/sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-9999.ebuild @@ -294,9 +294,9 @@ src_configure() { # We can enable this by default in future, but it's brand new # in 2.39 with several bugs: - # - Doesn't build on musl (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29477) - # - No man pages (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521) - # - Broken at runtime without Java (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29479) + # - Doesn't build on musl (https://sourceware.org/PR29477) + # - No man pages (https://sourceware.org/PR29521) + # - Broken at runtime without Java (https://sourceware.org/PR29479) # - binutils-config (and this ebuild?) needs adaptation first (https://bugs.gentoo.org/865113) $(use_enable gprofng) @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ src_configure() { # These hardening options are available from 2.39+ but # they unconditionally enable the behaviour even on arches # where e.g. execstacks can't be avoided. - # See https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29592. + # See https://sourceware.org/PR29592. # # TODO: Get the logic for this fixed upstream so it doesn't # create impossible broken combinations on some arches, like mips.