sys-libs/libseccomp: Sync with Gentoo

It's from Gentoo commit 1b1023ec6bee0475caa7ec6d74a2983bfb8a0238.

sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/sys-libs/libseccomp/files/libseccomp-2.6.0-aliasing.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/pull/459
+
+From e6904da422e68031b0237c1e005fc5e98c12e2cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Romain Geissler <romain.geissler@amadeus.com>
+Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 22:29:05 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] Fix strict aliasing UB in MurMur hash implementation.
+
+This was spotted when trying to upgrade the libseccomp fedora package to
+version 2.6.0 in fedora rawhide. It comes with gcc 15 and LTO enabled by
+default. When running the test 61-sim-transactions we get plenty of such
+errors in valgrind:
+
+==265507== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
+==265507==    at 0x4096AD: _hsh_add (gen_bpf.c:599)
+==265507==    by 0x40A557: UnknownInlinedFun (gen_bpf.c:2016)
+==265507==    by 0x40A557: gen_bpf_generate (gen_bpf.c:2341)
+==265507==    by 0x400CDE: UnknownInlinedFun (db.c:2685)
+==265507==    by 0x400CDE: UnknownInlinedFun (db.c:2682)
+==265507==    by 0x400CDE: UnknownInlinedFun (api.c:756)
+==265507==    by 0x400CDE: UnknownInlinedFun (util.c:162)
+==265507==    by 0x400CDE: UnknownInlinedFun (util.c:153)
+==265507==    by 0x400CDE: main (61-sim-transactions.c:128)
+==265507==  Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
+==265507==    at 0x409590: _hsh_add (gen_bpf.c:573)
+
+Investigating this a bit, it seems that because of LTO the MurMur hash
+implementation is being inlined in _hsh_add. The way we call getblock32
+with the explicit cast to const uint32_t* is a strict aliasing
+violation.
+
+This is reproducible on a "fedora:rawhide" container (gcc 15) and using:
+export CFLAGS='-O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -g'
+
+Signed-off-by: Romain Geissler <romain.geissler@amadeus.com>
+---
+ src/hash.c | 8 ++------
+ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/src/hash.c b/src/hash.c
+index 4435900f..301abfc9 100644
+--- a/src/hash.c
++++ b/src/hash.c
+@@ -12,15 +12,11 @@
+  */
+ 
+ #include <stdlib.h>
++#include <string.h>
+ #include <inttypes.h>
+ 
+ #include "hash.h"
+ 
+-static inline uint32_t getblock32(const uint32_t *p, int i)
+-{
+-	return p[i];
+-}
+-
+ static inline uint32_t rotl32(uint32_t x, int8_t r)
+ {
+ 	return (x << r) | (x >> (32 - r));
+@@ -56,7 +52,7 @@ uint32_t hash(const void *key, size_t length)
+ 	/* body */
+ 	blocks = (const uint32_t *)(data + nblocks * 4);
+ 	for(i = -nblocks; i; i++) {
+-		k1 = getblock32(blocks, i);
++		memcpy(&k1, &blocks[i], sizeof(uint32_t));
+ 
+ 		k1 *= c1;
+ 		k1 = rotl32(k1, 15);
+

sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/sys-libs/libseccomp/files/libseccomp-2.6.0-drop-bogus-test.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/commit/2f0f3b0e9121720108431c5d054164016f476230
+
+From 2f0f3b0e9121720108431c5d054164016f476230 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
+Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 11:12:55 -0500
+Subject: [PATCH] tests: remove the fuzzer from test 62-sim-arch_transactions
+
+We can't reliably run the bpf-sim-fuzz tests on tests which manipulate
+the filters arch/ABIs unless the filter is safe to run on all arch/ABIs,
+which is more or less impossible.  Remove the bpf-sim-fuzz test section
+in test #62 to work around this, just as we do with the other similar
+tests.
+
+Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
+Signed-off-by: Tom Hromatka <tom.hromatka@oracle.com>
+(cherry picked from commit 7db46d72f13c172b290818f624c2966bd0db5677)
+--- a/tests/62-sim-arch_transactions.tests
++++ b/tests/62-sim-arch_transactions.tests
+@@ -14,11 +14,6 @@ test type: bpf-sim
+ 62-sim-arch_transactions	+x86_64	open		N	N	N	N	N	N	KILL
+ 62-sim-arch_transactions	+x86_64	close		N	N	N	N	N	N	ALLOW
+ 
+-test type: bpf-sim-fuzz
+-
+-# Testname			StressCount
+-62-sim-arch_transactions	5
+-
+ test type: bpf-valgrind
+ 
+ # Testname
+

sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/sys-libs/libseccomp/libseccomp-2.6.0-r1.ebuild

@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+# Copyright 1999-2025 Gentoo Authors
+# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
+
+EAPI=8
+
+DISTUTILS_EXT=1
+DISTUTILS_OPTIONAL=1
+DISTUTILS_USE_PEP517=setuptools
+PYTHON_COMPAT=( python3_{10..13} )
+
+inherit distutils-r1 multilib-minimal
+
+DESCRIPTION="High level interface to Linux seccomp filter"
+HOMEPAGE="https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp"
+
+if [[ ${PV} == *9999 ]] ; then
+	EGIT_REPO_URI="https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp.git"
+	PRERELEASE="2.6.0"
+	inherit autotools git-r3
+else
+	SRC_URI="https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/releases/download/v${PV}/${P}.tar.gz"
+	KEYWORDS="-* ~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~hppa ~loong ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~riscv ~s390 ~x86 ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux"
+fi
+
+LICENSE="LGPL-2.1"
+SLOT="0"
+IUSE="python static-libs test"
+RESTRICT="!test? ( test )"
+REQUIRED_USE="python? ( ${PYTHON_REQUIRED_USE} )"
+
+# We need newer kernel headers; we don't keep strict control of the exact
+# version here, just be safe and pull in the latest stable ones. bug #551248
+DEPEND="
+	>=sys-kernel/linux-headers-5.15
+	python? ( ${PYTHON_DEPS} )
+"
+RDEPEND="${DEPEND}"
+BDEPEND="
+	${DEPEND}
+	dev-util/gperf
+	python? (
+		${DISTUTILS_DEPS}
+		dev-python/cython[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
+	)
+"
+
+PATCHES=(
+	"${FILESDIR}"/libseccomp-2.6.0-python-shared.patch
+	"${FILESDIR}"/libseccomp-2.5.3-skip-valgrind.patch
+	"${FILESDIR}"/${P}-drop-bogus-test.patch
+	"${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-2.6.0-aliasing.patch
+)
+
+src_prepare() {
+	default
+
+	if [[ ${PV} == *9999 ]] ; then
+		sed -i -e "s/0.0.0/${PRERELEASE}/" configure.ac || die
+
+		eautoreconf
+	fi
+}
+
+multilib_src_configure() {
+	local myeconfargs=(
+		$(use_enable static-libs static)
+		--disable-python
+	)
+
+	ECONF_SOURCE="${S}" econf "${myeconfargs[@]}"
+}
+
+multilib_src_compile() {
+	emake
+
+	if multilib_is_native_abi && use python ; then
+		# setup.py expects libseccomp.so to live in "../.libs"
+		# Copy the python files to the right place for this.
+		rm -r "${BUILD_DIR}"/src/python || die
+		cp -r "${S}"/src/python "${BUILD_DIR}"/src/python || die
+		local -x CPPFLAGS="-I\"${BUILD_DIR}/include\" -I\"${S}/include\" ${CPPFLAGS}"
+
+		# setup.py reads VERSION_RELEASE from the environment
+		local -x VERSION_RELEASE=${PRERELEASE-${PV}}
+
+		pushd "${BUILD_DIR}/src/python" >/dev/null || die
+		distutils-r1_src_compile
+		popd >/dev/null || die
+	fi
+}
+
+multilib_src_test() {
+	emake -Onone check
+}
+
+multilib_src_install() {
+	emake DESTDIR="${D}" install
+
+	if multilib_is_native_abi && use python ; then
+		distutils-r1_src_install
+	fi
+}
+
+multilib_src_install_all() {
+	find "${ED}" -type f -name "${PN}.la" -delete || die
+
+	einstalldocs
+}

sdk_container/src/third_party/portage-stable/sys-libs/libseccomp/libseccomp-2.6.0.ebuild

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ if [[ ${PV} == *9999 ]] ; then
 	inherit autotools git-r3
 else
 	SRC_URI="https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/releases/download/v${PV}/${P}.tar.gz"
-	KEYWORDS="-* ~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~hppa ~loong ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~riscv ~s390 ~x86 ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux"
+	KEYWORDS="-* amd64 arm arm64 hppa ~loong ~mips ppc ppc64 ~riscv ~s390 x86 ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux"
 fi
 
 LICENSE="LGPL-2.1"
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ BDEPEND="
 PATCHES=(
 	"${FILESDIR}"/libseccomp-2.6.0-python-shared.patch
 	"${FILESDIR}"/libseccomp-2.5.3-skip-valgrind.patch
+	"${FILESDIR}"/${P}-drop-bogus-test.patch
 )
 
 src_prepare() {